Ultrasonographic evaluation of the anterior axillary recess in the normal shoulder

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29327/218041.32.37-2

Keywords:

anterior axillary recess, ultrasound, shoulder

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to demonstrate the usefulness of ultrasound to estimate the thickness of the anterior axillary recess (AAR) in the shoulder, determine if the thickness of the anterior axillary recess is altered with the patient's position, the degree of arm abduction, gender and laterality; compare the thickness of the anterior axillary recess obtained with the normal value reported in current scientific literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study, carried out in 32 normal volunteers aged between 18-60 years, excluding people who had a history of inflammatory and traumatic pathology of the rotator cuff, rheumatic diseases, diabetics and hypothyroid patients. An ultrasound evaluation protocol was designed considering the variables patient position, arm position in abduction of 90º, 60º and 45º, laterality and gender. The descriptive statistical analysis of the quantitative variables was carried out by calculating the mean, standard deviation, error of the mean and confidence intervals; The variation of AAR according to position, laterality and gender was analyzed with one-way ANOVA. The thickness AAR by ultrasound and MRI was compared with the t-student test for a single sample; after determining normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test. RESULTS: Of 32 normal volunteers, 20 (62.5%) women and 12 (38.5%) men, obtaining 64 cases. The thickness of the anterior axillary recess without discriminating the patient's position or the degree of abduction was 2.07 mm, (SD ± 0.34mm), 95% CI [2.03 – 2.11 mm]. No statistically significant difference was found in the anterior axillary recess according to the patient's position, arm abduction (p=0.055) or laterality (p=0.085). According to gender, the ARR is thicker in men, 2.38mm, 95% CI [2.16 – 2.58 mm], the difference was significant (p=0.00). When comparing the thickness of the anterior axillary recess obtained with the normal value reported in current scientific literature, a statistically significant difference was found (p=0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound allows the evaluation of the anterior axillary recess of the shoulder, the thickness is not altered with the patient's position or the degree of arm abduction, but it is thicker in men than in women and the average thickness obtained differs from the normal reference value.

References

Musculoskeletal – shoulder [Internet]. Nysora. [Cited 2024 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.nysora.com/musculoskeletal/shoulder/.

Stella S, Gualtierotti R, Ciampi B, Trentanni C, Sconfienza L, Del Chiaro A, Pacini P, Miccoli M, Galletti S. Ultrasound features of adhesive capsulitis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9(2):481-95.

Do J, Hwang J, Yoon K, Lee Y. Correlation of ultrasound findings with clinical stages and impairment in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(5):23259671211003675.

Cerezal L, García R, Canga A, Rolón A, Abascal F. Técnica e indicaciones de la resonancia magnética de artrografía. extremidad superior (I). Radiología. 2006;48(6):341-56.

Muñoz Ch y Paolinelli G. Artroresonancia de hombro. Rev Chil Radiol. 2002;8(1):13-8.

Garcia-Macero RA, Foo Gil KA, López Pereiro O, Solla Camino, M. Evaluación ecográfica de la anatomía del hombro en 10 pasos y hallazgos patológicos más comunes: revisión narrativa. EuroEco. 2021;10(1):1-8.

Mendoza J, Ornelas J, Echairu E, Gutierrez F. Repaso anatómico y técnica exploratoria ultrasonográfica de hombro. An Radiol Méx. 2005;3:217-26.

Emig EW, Schweitzer ME, Karasick D, Lubowitz J. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: MR diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(6):1457-9.

Fields BKK, Skalski MR, Patel DB, White EA, Tomasian A, Gross JS, Matcuk GR. Adhesive capsulitis: review of imaging findings, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment options. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48(8):1171-84.

Pimenta M, Vassalou EE, Cardoso-Marinho B, Klontzas ME, DimitriPinheiro S, Karantanas AH. The role of MRI and ultrasonography in diagnosis and treatment of glenohumeral joint adhesive capsulitis. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2023;34(1):7-15.

Moragues Pastor C, Michelena X, Morales I, Juárez P, Lluch J, Nolla JM. Ultrasound evaluation of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. description of a new and simple diagnostic sign. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018; 77(2 Suppl):1690.

Klauser AS, Tagliafico A, Allen GM, Boutry N, Campbell R, Court-Payen M, Grainger A, Guerini H, McNally E, O'Connor PJ, Ostlere S, Petroons P, Reijnierse M, Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Wilson DJ, Martinoli C. Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound: a delphi-based consensus paper of the european society of musculoskeletal radiology. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22(5):1140-8.

Published

2024-10-08 — Updated on 2024-12-02

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Galindo LP, Mayanga SL, Gomes MJ. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the anterior axillary recess in the normal shoulder. RBUS [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 2 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];32(37). Available from: https://revistarbus.sbus.org.br/rbus/article/view/8